• | Main Menu | Home | About Us | What's New | FAQ | Site Search | Contact Us | Catalog | Privacy Policy | •
by Elmer M. Cranton, M.D.
It seems counterintuitive but is nonetheless scientifically proven
that less than 7 percent increase
in the interior diameter of a blood vessel can double the flow of
blood. Angiograms and ultrasound imaging are only accurate to within 20 percent and cannot measure such small changes, despite repeated
demands by opponents of EDTA chelation therapy that this be the "gold
standard" for effectiveness.
A doubling of blood flow can
obviously relieve symptoms of blockage and can also reduce the risk a heart attack
or stroke. A doubling in size of the opening past a plaque will
increase the flow of blood by more than 16 times. An increase of less than
7% will double blood flow. Angiograms are much too inaccurate to
provide the type of evidence demanded by critics, without which
they refuse to accept a large amount of clinical
research showing that chelation therapy is truly effective. Objective
measurements of functional improvement and increased blood flow, well
documented before and after treatment in published clinical trials should be the "gold
standard" for success, not imprecise imaging.
Poiseuille's law corresponds to Ohm's law for electrical circuits (V = I R),
where the pressure is analogous to the voltage V and rate of blood flow is analogous to the current I. Then the resistance
R=
This concept is useful because the effective resistance in an artery is inversely proportional to the fourth power of the radius or diameter. This means that halving the internal diameter of the vessel increases the resistance to blood flow by 16 times.
By applying
Poiseuille's Equation to the flow of blood through even a
healthy, smooth-walled artery with laminar flow, we find that the volume of blood
flow increases or decreases relative to Pi divided by 8 times blood pressure, times the fourth
power of the artery's interior diameter, divided by the product of the
artery's interior diameter times the dynamic viscosity of the blood. In a diseased artery
with turbulent flow past plaque, this fourth power equation changes to the fifth power.
In other words, coronary blood flow is inversely proportional to the of the
interior diameter raised to its fifth power (1/D5). To put this
another way, doubling the width of an opening through the narrow gap beside
a plaque can potentially increase the flow of blood by 20 times or
more. A mere 7% or less increase in the opening of a blocked artery will
double the flow of blood.
Blood is noncompressible and only half liquid. The other half is composed of red and white
blood cells. These cells rub along blood vessel walls creating friction and
thus move more
slowly than more fluid blood in the center of an artery. This means that blood
highly viscous and somewhat sticky as it flows. Because the distance
(relative to blood cells) between the outer wall and the center of a vessel is
much less in small blood vessels, a small increase in the internal diameter
will result in a very large increase in the flow of blood. Blood flow past
plaques is turbulent, causing even more resistance. In diseased
arteries with plaque an increase in diameter in the range of than 6 percent can
double the flow of blood and totally relieve symptoms of blockage.
Both liquid and cell-free portions of blood are more viscous than pure water because
of blood's high protein content. Cell-free plasma is about 1.5 times more viscous
than water. When blood cells are added, the viscosity increases to more than 3
times that of water.
The cross sectional area in the opening in a blood vessel decreases
proportionate to the square of a change in diameter. An artery of half the diameter
has only one fourth the cross sectional area.
Combining all of these factors together, as shown by Poiseuille’ Equation,
we see that a mere doubling the internal diameter of a coronary artery, for
example, can result in a 16-fold increase
in the flow of blood (assuming no change in blood pressure, viscosity, or length
of the artery). Put
another way, a smooth, healthy a blood vessel will carry twice as much blood if
the interior increases less than 10% in diameter. A blood vessel with plaque
and has turbulent flow and a mere 7 percent or less increase in internal diameter
can double the flow of blood.
Angiograms and ultrasound imaging are only accurate to within approximately
20 percent. Even when repeated an hour later on the same patient, using the
same technique, readings can vary by more than 20 percent. That amount of
disagreement was reported when coronary angiograms were circulated among a
large number of leading, academic medical centers and interpreted
independently by the best specialists available. This explains why patients
whose symptoms have improved dramatically following chelation therapy may not show a significant change on followup
angiogram. For the same reason, calcium scores on followup ultra-fast,
electron-beam, CT scan (EBCT) are also not a reliable way to measure benefit
following chelation therapy.
If a patient feels much better, if symptoms improve, if exercise tolerance
increases, it can be a waste of time, money, and
an unnecessary risk to
do routine follow-up angiograms merely to document improvement from EDTA chelation
therapy. The proof of the pudding is in the eating. If symptoms improve and
remain improved, it
seems logical to assume that blood flow has increased. Placebo effect rarely
lasts for very long, while benefits from chelation therapy persist for years. If
that benefit can be
maintained over time with periodic chelation treatments, combined with
healthy lifestyle and nutritional supplementation,
enormous good can be achieved without
resorting to surgery,
stents or other potentially dangerous procedures.
References
Poiseuille's
Law
Scientific details on Poiseuille's Law
Cardiovascular Physiology and Poiseuille's Equation
Mount Rainier Clinic
503 First Street South, Suite 1
Yelm, Washington 98597, USA
Telephone: (360) 458-1061
FAX: (360) 458-1661
email: Click here to send us an email message
Copyright © 2007 John A. Cranton, ARNP, all rights reserved
Last modified: Disclaimer